President H. E. Sebastián Piñera and his wife, Cecilia Morel, attended the A
nnual Forum of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, as part of his working visit to Boston September 23, 2011. I saw a
blog post today that showed an audience member pose a question and a snippet of Piñera's response regarding the student revolt that has been on going for about 6 months now. While I understand its use as a political and advocacy tool, I resented not having full access to the complete video or transcript. After a little poking about I discovered the speech was recorded and archived by Harvard (and I would not have expected anything less). His presentation,
The Chilean Path to Development to the Harvard's John F. Kennedy Forum may be viewed in its entirety. In order to view the video you
MUST have
RealPlayer downloaded .
The video is expected to be available for download Wednesday, September 28 on
iTunes U Harvard University: Institute of Politics- John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum. Below I summarize the presentation and then attempt to quote verbatim the first questioner and the President's response. The questioner makes a pointed attempt to challenge the President on an apparent "change of policy" mentioned in an earlier speech compared to the reality as described by the questioner of the students back home in Chile. That exchange follows the summary.
One point of clarification or correction in the President's response to this individual. He suggests the exchange rate for Chilean Peso to the US Dollar is 200-1. In reality the day of the speech (9/23/2011) it was nearly 518-1.
As for the rest of the questions I encourage you to look and listen for yourselves:
The Chilean Path to Development
The program begins with introductions by
Dean David Ellwood and
Professor Marilee Grindle
Dean Ellwood's opening comments welcomes back Piñera to Harvard. The Dean notes that holding a forum at 4:00 PM on a Friday afternoon and to have it in fact start
early is a testament to the importance and anticipation Piñera's presentation. Ellwood cautions that there is only one firm and absolute rule for the speakers at the Kennedy Forum: to take free and unfettered questions from the audience. The audience for its part must also remain respectful of the speaker. Professor Grindle introduces the President noting the world's focus on Chile to due to the earthquake of 2010, the 33 miners and most recently the protests for education reform.
Piñera opens his speech recalling his first day of class at Harvard, September 11, 1973, the day that Chile lost its democracy for 17 years due to Pinochet's
coup de tat of
President Allende. He recalls how that night he called Cecilia Morel, his girlfriend at the time and asked her to marry him.
Piñera presents Chile today as a country no longer separated by the wall of poverty that had stretched between the northern and southern hemisphere. Rather his country is now in the midst of a transformation into a developed country offering its people quality opportunities. Chile has joined others to form a society of information referring to its development system of communications. He notes that his country once the poorest of all of Spain's colonies now has the highest per capita income in all of Latin America. It has free trade with 58 countries.
The Chilean experience, known as the
Chilean Miracle, during the 12 years between 1987-1998 were years of prosperity. Many trade agreements were made, employment was improving, investments were improving, an impressive accomplishment given after 17 years of dictatorship. Piñera notes a new logic of dialogue and agreements took precedence over a dialogue of confrontation.
With the financial crisis of 1998-2009, Chile lost its momentum of leadership and will of becoming a prosperous country known as the Chilean Night. The growth rate halved, employment was low, investment went down. The country lost its potential of becoming and retaining its status of a developed country. He notes that with the election of 2010 he democratically won the right to lead his country away from 20 years of
the Concertación coalition government and lead it towards prosperity.
Piñera observes he has only been in power for 18 months. Beginning 10 days prior to his taking office he recalls and describes the disaster and economic impact of the fifth largest earthquake, February 27, 2010. Besides the great lost of lives, great devastation with a loss of one out every three schools and hospitals, roads, airports and other private and public investments and wealth. Piñera points out that losses amounted to 20% of of Chile's GMP as compared to less than 1/10 of 1% of USA's GMP after Katrina.
The second great event of his first year of office was the
Bicentennial Celebration of Chile's independence. Following that event Piñera recalls the
Copiapó mining accident trapping 33 miners below ground more than 2,000 feet below the ground for 69 days. Anguish and desperation were the feelings of the families and his country. He recalls his self commitment and that of the government to their rescue as though they were his own son.
Other results during his 18 months in government Piñera lists include:
- Economic growth rate of 8.4% (compared to 2.7% under Michele Bachelet
- Creation of nearly 1/2 million jobs (compared to the USA the equivalent of 15 million jobs)
- Increases in exportation (20%) and investment (moving upwards and out of placement below zero)
- The ability to move from poverty to development
As a developing country Chile is stable democracy, transparent, open integrated market and economy, but that is not enough for continued progress, says Piñera. Today Chile must build new pillars of development:
- Major change in education to improve quality, access and finance at all levels, scholar and university levels
- Triple investment in science and technology
- Promote innovation and creativity, the only real renewable and inexhaustible means of growth
- Rid and defeat poverty building a society with a real equality of opportunity, justice, firmness and respect for all
Main concerns of Chile currently:
- The international economy, especially with the USA at the brink of default and Europe's inability to sort out its crises
- The lack of a strong international governance to address current global issues: Global warming, economic crisis, terrorism, organized crime, drug trafficking, hunger, poverty. Changes need to be made in world international institutions starting with the UN, World Bank, IMF.
- Much more needs to be accomplished in Chile to become a realized and developed country. Some believe that all has been accomplished and now benefits must be given to everybody according to some impatient Chilean people. Work remains in per capita increases, improving institutions, strengthening democracy, assuring equality in income distribution, improving the environment, providing human rights. A responsible government must resist giving it all to those who demand it. Currently Chile has 20 Billion USD in banks around the world, but with today's news is concerned about their deposits. Spending Chile's savings means "Bread for today, hunger for tomorrow."
- Avoid the entrapment in a middle income level trap
The future holds that the Pacific Ocwill now become the center of the world especially with the Trans Pacific Partnership, a free trade agreement with countries on both sides of the Pacific Ocean. OPEC meeting in Honolulu will see a big jump ahead in this project.
Piñera's closes quoting
that some people see the world as it is and ask why, while others dream of the world as it should be and ask why not. noting the greater need of the later for Chile's future. He adds the times are made of men and women and if we are to have better times we must have better people.
The President finally announces a strategic alliance between the State of Massachusetts and Chile in the areas of energy education, and technology.
Questions /Answers:
[
Note: I have attempted to transcribe as accurately as possible the first question and the Presiden's response in their entirety. DM]
Piñera jokes that he is forced to take all the questions, but not obliged to give all the answers.
Question 1: Artist Historian: (see also http://vimeo.com/29577248 )
I have a question for you sir: I was very please with your speech yesterday before the general assembly. But I was slightly confused by one point. During your speech you said, you referred to the student movement as you did today and you referred to the cause as great, noble, and beautiful cause, if my memory doesn't betray me. Now I must say that I was fairly surprised because that is not what the Chilean government has been telling the students in Chile.
On the contrary. It has been saying the exact opposite. It has either belittled their demands or demeaned them, or just plan ignored them and suspend the right to assembly and in some cases extremely forcefully repressing their gatherings.
So basically my question is does this reflect the change of policy on your behalf; will you sit down with the students and listen to their demands without any conditions as they have requested?
Thank you sir.
Piñera's response to Speaker 1:
One American that ran for pres for have the right to have their own opinions but not their own facts. So let me start by disagreeing with the "facts" you have pointed out. First of all we have never repressed the right to gather or protest because that is a constitutional right. And we also have the First Amendment. And we are a very respectful government and particularly of the law [chuckle] the great law of the land. The students have manifested more than 100 times in all cities and the streets of our country and they have never been denied. So the first fact you pointed out I think is wrong. Secondly we have never repressed them, actually there have 550 people injured during the last protest that has taken place in the last four months, 510 of them are policemen and only 40 of them are civilians so of course we have to keep public order because that is another responsibility.
So I think you have started with two wrong assessment but let me go to the central part of your question. Of course I think cost of improving the quality of education is a great noble and beautiful and URGENT cost and we agree with that 100%. That's why our government is undertaking the major educational reform that should have been undertaken many years ago by the former governments. And we're doing that! Even though we are not part of the problem, we want to be part of the solution to the education sector in our country. But of course we fully agree that we need to undertake a huge, a major, a
Coperincan reform of our education sector, and we're doing that. I don't have the time here to express everything that we have done in terms of changing the system, the law, improving the financing, improving the quality but there is one thing I would like to mention to you in this respect. We have committed all the resources necessary to for this; not only the normal budget of the Ministery of Education but we have dedicated 4 billion USD on top of the regular budget in order to finance this major reform. 4 Billion dollars! In Chile you have to multiply that by 200 to compare that to with a US figure.
And we have some disagreements with the students and I have no problem in speak openly about those disagreements. They are asking for many thing. One thing they ask is free education for everybody. We agree that we should guarantee education for the lower levels. Before schools because it is there we can correct this inequality before they become absolutely irreversible at the school level.
But at the university level we think that education should be free only for those people that really need it. Because we don't think this is feasible and we don't think that it is fair that we use tax payer's money, particularly the taxes paid by the poorest to finance the education of the rich. That's our disagreement.
I mean the democracy ... we have to learn to live with disagreements.
And the way to solve them is not with Molotov bombs, or rocks, or violence. The way to solve them is using out democracy system, which is what we have been proposing them from the very first moment.
And the second difference and disagreement is that we believe that the government should never monopolize the education sector in the country because that would be a betrayal to the freedom, to quality and we believe that both the private sector and the public sector should participate in the education sector. the government is responsible for the quality of both sectors. The government is responsible for financing through scholarship or loans to all those students that needs those scholarships and loans.
But the government doesn't have the right to take away from the parents the right to choose or from the student the right to choose where and what they want to study.
Those are the two differences.
So today I will repeat once again that the costs to increase and improve the quality of education is not only a great noble and beautiful cause. It is the main mission of our government.
Click here to view the remaining 15 minutes of the questions and answers of Piñera's speech,
The Chilean Path to Development to the Harvard's John F. Kennedy Forum may be viewed in its entirety. In order to view the video you
MUST have
RealPlayer downloaded .
The video is expected to be available for download Wednesday, September 28 on
iTunes U Harvard University: Institute of Politics- John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum.
Summary of other questions/answers
Question 2. Practice of freedom of association - the difficulty of making a labor union, forming collective tribe without government approval would you grant us freedom of associations or would you keep things as they are now?
Piñera:Yes. He is working on that
Question 3. Rapid growth concerns
Piñera:Yes a very strong concern -that will require large investment on infrastructure
Question 4. Vision of serving in a public sector -What are lessons learned and advice to better prepare youth for public office and success in that office.
Piñera:We need the talent of young people. Battle between audacity and prudence- both attributes are needed. Speaker is invited directly to come back to La Moneda.
Question 5. Failure of international governance systems - what are their greatest faults, vision for better systems concrete conditions that countries such as USA can achieve improvements
Piñera: Environment controls and governance lacking, Financial crisis worldwide, UN- who is coordinating world effort--answer is nobody. Countries will have to give up part of their sovereignty in order to strengthen international governance.
Question 6: There are significant differences remain between the government and the students, with many losing an academic year. In faect there was a
march yesterday (September 22, 2011) What is your plan to resolve this conflict?
Piñera: Makes light of missing another march. Notes there are many attending school on a regular basis. They have always been ready to dialogue with the president. The process is through the Congress. Present their proposals there. If they don't reach an agreement- use democracy.
Question 7: You mentioned it is important for the USA to solve its debt problems in order to secure world prosperity but also prosperity in Chile. As an economist/world leader what would you suggest to the President of the USA as well as the federal government to solve our debt crisis- include points on cutting back on federal spending and on raising federal taxes.
Piñera: Advised against becoming involved in the internal politics of other countries because you have nothing to win and a lot to loose...but I will disobey that advice. I am convinced that USA cannot have the fiscal deficit either cut spending or increase taxes...and I leave that up to the American people.
Question 8: Privatized pension system has received praise but more pressure for state spending on that model.
Piñera: Chile moved from public system to a private system in which everyone must pay and it goes to a personal account. At retirement the individual receives that funds. If savings is not enough to guarantee a certain minimum pension the government will intercede. Individual may put in more as desired, retire when desired. Solidarity component - savings calculated will assure a dignified pension.